Posts Tagged ‘massachusetts’


    Loading...

  • What Does Scott Brown Mean for the Health-Care Debate?

    Thursday, January 21st, 2010 at 01:01 | Comments Off

    So maybe that big health-care bill won’t pass. Either that, or the Dems will have to thread the legislative needle even as opposition to the bill is running high. That’s the gist of this morning’s Washington coverage (e.g. WSJ, Washington Post, New York Times, Politico).

    The key points:

    Scott Brown’s win in Massachusetts means the Dems no longer have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. That means Republicans could (and almost certainly would) block any wholesale changes to the Senate health-care bill. The ..read more
  • Medical Marijuana: Research, State Law and the Feds

    Wednesday, January 20th, 2010 at 01:24 | Comments Off

    To no one’s surprise, Jon Corzine signed New Jersey’s medical marijuana bill into law yesterday, on his last day on the job as the state’s governor.

    That makes 14 states that have legalized medical marijuana. But as both the WSJ and the New York Times note this morning, research into the medical uses of the drug remains rather limited.

    That’s partly due to the fact that it’s not easy for researchers to study the drug, the NYT suggests. The article cites the ..read more

  • Today, It’s the Coakley-Brown Health-Care Bill

    Wednesday, January 20th, 2010 at 00:44 | Comments Off

    The morning papers are full of speculation about what the Democrats will do with their health-care bill if Scott Brown, a Republican, wins the senate seat formerly held by Ted Kennedy. Massachusetts is holding a special election for the seat today; if Brown defeats Martha Coakley, a Democrat, the Dems will lose their filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.

    One option would be for the House to pass the bill already approved by the Senate. That possibility gets top billing in ..read more

  • Feds Accuse Doc of Faking Research On Pfizer & Merck Drugs

    Saturday, January 16th, 2010 at 04:29 | Comments Off

    It looks like Scott Reuben, the Massachusetts anesthesiologist said to have used phony research data in 21 published papers, has reached a plea deal with the feds.

    Federal prosecutors accused Reuben of health-care fraud for allegedly faking data that suggested after-surgery benefits from painkillers including Merck’s Vioxx and Pfizer’s Bextra and Celebrex, the Justice Department said yesterday. The Justice announcement said he faces as much as a 10-year sentence and a $250,000 fine.

    But the Associated Press said Reuben, the former chief ..read more

  • No Free Lunch for Doctors, Brought to You By Jersey’s AG

    Friday, December 4th, 2009 at 09:50 | Comments Off

    The push to clamp down on the relationship between doctors and drug and device companies came to New Jersey today. A report from the attorney general’s office there called for state agencies to create a bunch of new rules that would:

    Bar doctors and their office staff from accepting food from drug companies, “whether in-office, at health care facilities or in commercial venues, such as restaurants.” Laws in Vermont and Massachusetts recently went into effect imposing similar restrictions.

    Require doctors who are ..read more

  • Doctor: I Was Fired for Fighting Hospital’s Ties to Medtronic

    Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009 at 10:20 | Comments Off

    Medical device companies like Medtronic have been under fire lately for their megabucks deals with doctors who can influence purchases of medical products.

    So what happens to doctors who complain about these types of relationships? Those who, in effect, are whistleblowers?

    One doctor got fired, according to a lawsuit filed in state court in Massachusetts by David Gossman, an interventional cardiologist formerly on staff at the prestigious Lahey Clinic hospitals in the Boston area. According to his lawsuit, he complained about Medtronic’s ..read more

  • Baucus Tweaks Health-Care Bill to Win Broader Support

    Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 at 23:34 | Comments Off

    As Republicans laid into Max Baucus’s health-care bill Tuesday, the senator said he’d accept some of the more than 500 amendments that other Finance Committee members have suggested for the legislation.

    The changes would lower the penalty on those who don’t buy coverage and blunt the effects of a tax on high-end health-insurance policies, the WSJ notes. And they’d increase government subsidies to help people buy insurance.

    His 36-page list of modifications looks largely (but not wholly) designed to win support ..read more

  • Kerry: Tax on Medical-Device Makers Could Derail Innovation

    Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 at 05:29 | Comments Off

    Sen. John Kerry hasn’t been shy about supporting new taxes to pay for the health-care overhaul. The Massachusetts Democrat was the force behind a provision in the Senate Finance Committee’s health bill that puts a 35% tax on generous health-insurance plans, the bill’s main source of new revenue.

    But when it comes to the bill’s proposed tax on medical-device makers, Kerry is striking a different tone. At a committee meeting on the health bill today, he said he’s concerned about a ..read more

  • More Baucus Bill: Subsidies and a ‘Young Invincible’ Plan

    Thursday, September 17th, 2009 at 02:10 | Comments Off

    We’re combing through the 223-page health overhaul bill that Sen. Max Baucus unveiled this morning. Here are some tidbits about what kinds of plans insurers would need to offer to be allowed into the insurance exchange and who would be eligible for insurance subsidies:

    Baucus defines plans by the level of coverage they provide — think benefit levels dubbed as bronze, silver and gold. In order to be allowed to enter the exchange, the bill says plans must offer a basic ..read more

  • What the Baucus Bill Could Mean for Chantix

    Thursday, September 10th, 2009 at 03:56 | Comments Off

    While analysts are scouring the proposed Baucus health-reform bill, a draft of which has been circulating since the weekend, here’s one tidbit that stuck out in the dry language — Medicaid will no longer classify smoking cessation prescription drugs as “excludable.” Put another way, the medicines will be covered by the program that provides coverage to low-income people.

    That could be good news for Pfizer, which makes the anti-smoking drug Chantix, and for GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Zyban, the major competitor to ..read more