Published On: October 23rd, 2009
A few weeks back, the WSJ’s Wash Wire predicted that the phrase “public option” — DC shorthand for a new, government-backed health-insurance plan — could come to mean any of several different things as the health care debate rolls on.
Here’s the version Democratic leaders in the Senate were kicking around today: Create a new health insurance plan backed by the federal government, but allow individual states to opt-out and not offer the plan.
This idea has surfaced before. And some key moderates — Democrat Ben Nelson, and Republican Olympia Snowe, two name two quoted today by Dow Jones Newswires — don’t like it. (Snowe has said she opposes creating a public option immediately, but supports creating a “trigger” that would launch a government-run plan if private insurers fail to meet certain benchmarks.)
If the Senate does include a public plan, the rates would likely be negotiated with doctors and hospitals. Over in the House today, the Washington Post notes, Democrats are moving toward a bill that would include a public option where the rates are tied to Medicare rates. Any differences between the bills — and it looks like there will be plenty — will have to be reconciled before a bill is sent to the president.

See more here:
Health Reform Flavor of the Day: The Opt-Out Public Option



Did you know:






